Dimitrije Popović, academic painter and writer
In the realm of art, it is uncommon to encounter individuals who merge profound intellectual depth with a rich tapestry of expression and tradition in their creative endeavors. Dimitrije Popović, a Montenegrin academic painter and writer, exemplifies an artist whose oeuvre spans from fine arts to literature, forging a connection between historical narratives and contemporary experiences, as well as weaving together mythology and the mundane aspects of daily life. In a conversation with “Diplomacy & Commerce Montenegro” magazine, he explores artistic paradigms and examines the artist’s role within society, delving into the profound philosophical and cultural dimensions that influence his work and perspective.
Mr. Popović, your work embodies a compelling blend of artistic elements that fuse both traditional and modern methodologies. How would you articulate your artistic expression and the journey of your creative process? What drives your creativity when developing new pieces?
I will begin my response by addressing the conclusion of your inquiry. I feel inspired and invigorated by both the traditional and the modern aspects alike. Regardless of whether it is a mythical, historical, sacred, or secular theme, each of the themes that engage me presents a challenge in how to mold it into a cohesive artistic expression, whether that be through a painting, sculpture, installation, or performance, all aimed at conveying the essence of the motif I am exploring. This blending of the traditional and the contemporary is conveyed through innovative expression. I can highlight several of my series, including those focused on the biblical figures “Judith,” “Salome,” and “Mary Magdalene,” as well as the series “Corpus Mysticum,” which draws inspiration from the suffering of Christ. I have created cycles surrounding Dante, Leonardo, and Njegoš’s poem “The Light of the Microcosm.” I would also highlight modern themes like Marilyn Monroe or fashion as a social and aesthetic phenomenon, which I have also explored. Typically, every theme presents a significant challenge for creative expression because of its intricate nature. The artist confronts the challenge of transforming the subject into a new artistic and aesthetic realm, all while preserving its fundamental essence. And the challenge of how to mold it, ensuring it stands apart from all the works created before it. In my most expansive interpretation, I have never encountered or perceived tradition as an antiquated concept. On the contrary, tradition is for me immensely rich and invigorating, serving as a fundamental aspect of our current reality. Creators possess a profound understanding of this, and indeed, the annals of artistic expression validate this in the most compelling manner. It has been aptly observed that myths serve as the foundations of contemporary thought.
The act of painting frequently invites deep reflection. Your works frequently reveal profound symbols and metaphors. How do you perceive the connection between tangible experiences and conceptual representations in your artwork?
The concept of reality, often referred to as objective reality, serves as the foundation for the creation of the imaginary. At its core, all things originate from the tangible, and artistic expression serves as a thoughtful interpretation of that truth. In the realm of creativity, intricate portrayals of existence are revealed, with humanity at the forefront of this exploration. The man is the performer and pivotal character, the creator of the universe that he constructs and deconstructs. Humanity, with its inherent contradictions, shapes the world while remaining fundamentally unchanged. This essence is captured through symbols and metaphors, articulated in creative or written forms. The central theme throughout history revolves around the essential religious and philosophical dilemma of humanity as a finite existence. Years ago, my collection of essays titled “Death in Painting” was released, exploring the significance of this theme for numerous artists and the remarkable artworks it inspired. Certainly, we could delve deeper into the subject by exploring a range of human experiences, including concepts like morality, isolation, anxiety, selflessness, and the pursuit of holiness, among others. The tangible reality you refer to serves as a benchmark and motivation for translating abstract components that shape the envisioned realm of the painting.
What is your evaluation of the present status of Montenegrin fine art in the international arena? Is the avenue for global acknowledgment accessible to artists hailing from Montenegro?
The quality of Montenegrin art is impressive, showcasing the potential for significant involvement in the global art arena. Nonetheless, challenges emerge regarding state logistics, particularly in the execution of a structured and thoughtfully planned initiative for the positioning of an artist. On numerous occasions, I have referenced the case of Petar Lubarda. It is astonishing that this remarkable painter, once celebrated globally, has faded into obscurity in today’s art scene. Today, emerging creators are presented with a wealth of opportunities to enhance their skills, thanks to the advancements in contemporary technology. During my time at the Academy of Fine Arts, possessing a substantial monograph by a master, whether classical or modern, was considered a privilege. Today, the landscape has shifted, creating a more advantageous environment for emerging artists. Information sources are more abundant and quicker than ever. Nevertheless, in contrast to developed Western nations that allocate significant funds to cultural initiatives, including support for emerging creators, Montenegro remains considerably behind these benchmarks. However, each creator forges their unique journey. Recognition can be achieved gradually. Ongoing effort and steadfastness in innovative ideas are crucial. The path to global acknowledgment is open. And each open path presents a unique challenge to navigate.
The significance of art in society is gaining more prominence in contemporary times. How far do you believe artists ought to involve themselves in societal matters and express their views on contemporary issues through their creations?
An artist inherently embodies a duality of independence and engagement, reflecting their unique position in society. As a member of society, he contemplates the environment that shapes his existence and creativity. Regrettably, art may not possess the power to transform the world it inhabits, yet it has the capacity to engage with significant global issues, shape perceptions, and highlight its darker aspects to ultimately reinforce the positive. However, throughout all of this, creativity should stay firmly within the realm of artistic expression. When it compromises its inherent independence, which defines it as a form of expression, and relinquishes its distinctiveness for political aims, it dissolves, as Nabokov remarked, into “ordinary ideological nonsense”.
Considering that painting has been your way of life for decades, how does this influence your daily perspective on the world? How do you navigate the delicate equilibrium between creative expression and your various life responsibilities?
A perspective is a multifaceted concept. The world presents a complex tapestry of nuances in perception, yet the overarching view remains fundamentally unchanged. Overall, I hold a rather bleak perspective on the world, shaped by the prevailing negative narrative that, regrettably, is validated by historical context and the unfolding events of our time. Regarding the second part of the question, I believe I have long since found a harmony between creativity and the routine of daily existence. I harmonized my personal life with my work commitments.